Tender comparison
Place comparable tender items and totals into a common review structure.

Compare submissions against a common scope, identify outliers and qualifications, and preserve the evidence behind the evaluation.
CivilQuant supports tender receipt and comparison, BOQ alignment, arithmetic checks, normalization, qualification review, rate and total outlier analysis, clarification tracking and reviewer-controlled recommendation evidence. Final procurement decisions remain with the appointed decision-makers.
The goal is to distinguish price differences from scope, qualification, arithmetic and risk differences.
Place comparable tender items and totals into a common review structure.
Check totals, missing items and other basic commercial exceptions.
Surface unusually high or low rates and material pricing differences.
Capture exclusions, qualifications and assumptions that affect comparability.
Track questions, responses, reviewer notes and resolution status.
Prepare a traceable evaluation record for the authorised procurement decision.
CivilQuant keeps price, scope and qualification differences visible so procurement reviewers can make the decision on a clearer evidence base.

CivilQuant serves organisations that need defensible quantities, values and asset records across South Africa, with particular relevance to Gauteng and major commercial and infrastructure markets.
The CivilQuant platform connects documents, quantities, formulas, rates, approvals and evidence so that service delivery can be faster without losing traceability.
Connect source documents, revisions, assumptions and outputs.
Use decimal-safe, unit-aware calculations for authoritative commercial arithmetic.
Keep professional judgement and issued decisions behind explicit review gates.
Tender analysis is the structured evaluation of tender submissions for price, scope, qualifications, arithmetic, risk and other criteria relevant to the procurement process.
Yes. It can organise comparable items, highlight rate differences and surface outliers for reviewer investigation.
No. It can produce analysis and evidence, but award decisions should remain with the authorised procurement and professional governance process.
Yes. A core benefit is carrying the reviewed commercial baseline into contract, variation and valuation workflows instead of re-keying it.
Bring the tender BOQ, submissions and qualification schedules and structure the evaluation around the evidence.