Condition grading
Record condition consistently at asset or component level.

Capture what is observed in the field and link it to the asset, component, evidence, risk and capital decision that follows.
An asset condition assessment records the observed state of a building, component or infrastructure asset, identifies defects or deterioration and provides evidence that can support maintenance, renewal, risk and capital decisions. CivilQuant keeps observations attached to the relevant asset and component.
Use condition assessments for individual buildings, due diligence, insurance context, maintenance planning or infrastructure portfolios.
Record condition consistently at asset or component level.
Attach photographs, documents, notes and inspection metadata.
Capture urgency, consequence and reviewable priority inputs.
Describe repair, maintenance or renewal requirements.
Link estimated intervention or replacement costs to the affected component.
Carry approved intervention needs into backlog and capital-plan scenarios.
CivilQuant avoids the common break between a condition survey report and the asset register or capital plan that should use it.

CivilQuant serves organisations that need defensible quantities, values and asset records across South Africa, with particular relevance to Gauteng and major commercial and infrastructure markets.
The CivilQuant platform connects documents, quantities, formulas, rates, approvals and evidence so that service delivery can be faster without losing traceability.
Connect source documents, revisions, assumptions and outputs.
Use decimal-safe, unit-aware calculations for authoritative commercial arithmetic.
Keep professional judgement and issued decisions behind explicit review gates.
The scope can include component identification, visual observations, defects, condition grading, evidence, urgency and recommended further investigation or intervention. Specialist testing may be required for some defects.
Yes. Repeat inspections can remain associated with the same asset or component, allowing condition history and intervention decisions to be reviewed.
Yes. Approved condition, criticality and cost evidence can feed maintenance backlog and multi-year capital planning.
No. The platform structures evidence and workflows. Specialist professional judgement, testing and sign-off remain with the appropriately qualified person where required.
Start with one building, site or asset class and connect the condition record to the register and capital need.